Responsibility: who answers for what a machine did
Ethics in plain words, the well-known cases of algorithms gone wrong, who holds the power, and what an ordinary person can do.
A course for people who use AI, work beside it or live under its decisions, which is by now nearly everyone. You will learn to ask who made a decision and who will answer for it, to take apart disputed cases without picking a side in advance, and to tell what is known from what is contested. The question here is who should answer, and what the law says now is in the course on law.
So far there is only this table of contents. Lessons appear one at a time, and we promise no dates. Feed of new lessons (Atom)
17 lessons, 4 parts
Part 1 What ethics is
Not a list of prohibitions but a way of working out what to do when honest people disagree.
- coming soon
Three questions of ethics
What are the consequences, what is my duty, what kind of person does this make me: three old traditions, and why none replaces the other two.
- coming soon
The moral machine
A huge survey on whom a driverless car should save, and why it shows preferences, not what is right.
- coming soon
No tool is neutral
Who chose the data, the goal and what a model refuses to do: how other people’s values end up in a system, and how to spot them.
Part 2 Who answers
A machine cannot be held to account, so the question is always about the people who deployed it, bought it and believed it.
- coming soon
A computer cannot be held accountable
An old line credited to IBM: what being accountable means, and why it applies only to people and organizations.
- coming soon
The responsibility gap
If a system learns on its own, nobody seems to be at fault: why some see a new problem in this and others a convenient excuse.
- coming soon
The human as a crumple zone
Madeleine Elish’s image, with the pedestrian killed by a self-driving Uber: why the nearest person pays for a system’s failure.
- coming soon
Horizon: believing the system over the people
The British Post Office prosecuted its own subpostmasters for years on an accounting system’s data: how that was possible, and who answered.
- coming soon
Robodebt: a debt worked out by averaging
An Australian scheme sent people debts based on averaged income, and it was a simple formula, not AI: that is the whole lesson.
- coming soon
Your name on the machine’s work
What you take on when you send out text or a decision a model prepared, and what it means to check it well enough to answer for it yourself.
Part 3 Bias in systems
Almost everything here is disputed, and the dispute itself is worth learning.
- coming soon
COMPAS: two truths about fairness
The dispute between reporters and the maker over the algorithm’s errors by race, and why with different base rates both conditions of fairness cannot hold.
- coming soon
Compared with whom
How one algorithm looks beside a layperson, a group of people and a simple formula, and what to compare it with before you judge.
- coming soon
Where bias comes from
Data about the past, a proxy in place of the goal, who was left out of the sample: why one fix does not remove bias.
Part 4 Power and the rules
Who has the computing, the data and the decisions, who limits them, and what the worried and the unworried argue about.
- coming soon
Who holds the power
Computing and data in few companies, the unseen work of data labelers: what is fact here, and what is a dispute about whether that is bad.
- coming soon
Who should write the rules
Whom to trust with limiting powerful systems: governments, courts or the companies themselves, and why no answer is obvious.
- coming soon
The safety debate
Some warn of extinction and others call AI an ordinary technology: who claims what, on what grounds, and what stays disputed.
- coming soon
What an ordinary person can do
Ask who decided, insist on a human, complain, refuse to sign: not much, and more than nothing.
- coming soon
A look ahead: agents that act on their own
When an agent spends money and signs things on its own, responsibility becomes an everyday question: who pays for a mistake, and how to agree on it.