Numbers: reading other people’s data and charts
How to see what an average, a poll, a chart or a study shown to you actually says, and where it is likely to mislead you.
A course for adults who are shown numbers in the news, at work and in advertising and who need not be mathematicians. You will read averages, samples, percentages, charts and scientific papers and ask the right questions of them, with almost no formulas. Making your own decisions under uncertainty belongs to the course “Reasoning when nothing is clear.”
So far there is only this table of contents. Lessons appear one at a time, and we promise no dates. Feed of new lessons (Atom)
18 lessons, 5 parts
Part 1 Simple numbers with a catch
The most common ways to mislead take no mathematics, and spotting them takes none either.
- coming soon
The average salary and yours
The mean and the median of the same incomes: why one billionaire lifts a room’s average, and which number you will be shown to impress you.
- coming soon
Percent and percentage points
A rise from 2 to 3 percent is one point and also a 50 percent increase: both answers are right, and what matters is which was chosen for you.
- coming soon
Twice the risk: from what to what
How relative risk differs from absolute risk, with Britain’s scare over the pill, where “double” turned out to be a tiny difference.
- coming soon
A number with no denominator
“Thousands of cases” out of how many, over what period and compared with what: that is where any talk of a large number has to start.
- coming soon
How common it is to begin with
What a base rate is, and why without it you cannot understand a risk or a test result: the courses on reasoning and health apply the idea.
Part 2 Where the data came from
Before you read a result, ask who was included, who was lost and who chose what to count.
- coming soon
Who was asked
The Literary Digest gathered millions of replies and picked the wrong president, and Gallup’s far smaller sample got it right: size does not fix a skew.
- coming soon
The planes that came back
Survivorship bias, with Abraham Wald and the advice of successful people, and what the popular legend added to Wald’s real work.
- coming soon
When a measure becomes a target
Goodhart’s law: how rankings, reports and model benchmarks break once someone gets paid for the number.
Part 3 Correlation and cause
Two lines moving together explain nothing yet, and establishing a cause is far harder than showing a link.
- coming soon
A link is not a cause
A third factor, cause and effect reversed and plain coincidence: how to spot each when someone shows you a handsome line.
- coming soon
Simpson’s paradox
Berkeley admissions: overall women got in less often, by department the bias vanished, so the conclusion depends on how the data is added up.
- coming soon
Why experiments exist
Observational studies suggested hormone therapy protects the heart, and a randomized trial did not bear that out: what random assignment gives you.
Part 4 Charts
A chart persuades faster than text, which is why it needs reading more slowly.
- coming soon
Same numbers, different pictures
Anscombe’s quartet: four data sets with nearly the same statistics and quite different plots, and why one summary number is not enough.
- coming soon
How a chart misleads
The cropped axis, the picture in place of a bar and two scales on one plot: how to spot them in ten seconds.
Part 5 How to read a study
“Scientists have proved” often means one paper with one threshold, and this part explains what stands behind it.
- coming soon
What p below 0.05 means
What a p-value really says: it gives neither the probability of a hypothesis nor the size of an effect.
- coming soon
Significant does not mean important
A large study will find even a tiny difference, and the question is what it changes for an actual person.
- coming soon
Fishing for a result
Freedom in collecting and analyzing data sharply raises the rate of false findings: what to look for in a paper’s methods.
- coming soon
The replication crisis
What happened when a large project repeated a hundred psychology studies, and why that finding is disputed too.
- coming soon
A look ahead: charts on demand
Models produce analysis and charts in seconds, so honest work and fudging both get cheaper: what to ask when no person stands behind the numbers.